LATEST ARTICLE

6/recent/ticker-posts

the'' one man one vote, one shilling '' Debate in kenya A Deep Dive

                         The "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" Debate in Kenya: A Deep Dive


Introduction:


In recent years, the "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" debate has captured the attention of Kenyans across the political spectrum. The idea behind this slogan is to allocate resources based on the population, ensuring that regions with a higher population receive a proportional share of the national cake. This article will explore the origins of the debate, its implications, and the various perspectives on this controversial topic.


Origins of the Debate:


The debate on equitable distribution of resources in Kenya is not new. However, the "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" slogan gained prominence during the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) discussions in 2020. Politicians from the Mt Kenya region, which has a significant population and contributes substantially to the national economy, have been advocating for this approach to resource allocation. They argue that it would ensure a fair distribution of resources based on the population, benefiting regions with higher populations (The Standard Group Plc, 2020).


Implications of the Debate:


The "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" proposal has sparked a heated debate among Kenyans, with various arguments for and against it. Proponents argue that it promotes fairness and equity in resource allocation, as it directly correlates the amount of resources a region receives with its population size. This approach could potentially lead to increased resources for regions with larger populations, such as the Northern Kenya region, in the short term (The Standard Group Plc, 2020).


However, critics argue that this approach could lead to the marginalization of less populated regions, particularly those in arid and semi-arid areas. These regions may not have the same economic productivity as more populated regions but still require significant resources for development and to address historical marginalization. The current revenue sharing formula attempts to balance these various factors, but there is ongoing debate about whether it adequately addresses the needs of all regions (The Star, 2023).



Political Perspectives:


The "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" debate has also been influenced by political dynamics within Kenya. Some politicians, especially from the Mt Kenya region, have been vocal in their support for the proposal, arguing that it would ensure that the region receives its fair share of resources based on its population and economic contributions (The Standard Group Plc, 2020).


However, the proposal has also faced opposition from other political leaders, who argue that it could lead to the marginalization of less populated regions and exacerbate existing inequalities. The Commission on Revenue Allocation (CRA) has also waded into the debate, stating that the "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" approach is impractical and would reverse gains made in equitable distribution of resources to all Kenyans (The Star, 2024).



Conclusion:


The "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" debate in Kenya is a complex issue that involves balancing the interests of different regions and addressing historical inequalities. While the proposal may seem appealing to some regions with larger populations, it must be balanced against the needs of other regions and the broader goal of equitable development across Kenya. As the debate continues, it is crucial for all stakeholders to consider the potential implications of the "One Man, One Vote, One Shilling" approach and work towards a solution that ensures fair and equitable distribution of resources for all Kenyans.


Sources:


1. The Standard Group Plc. (2020, April 20). Mt Kenya roots for ‘one man, one vote, one shilling’. The Standard. Retrieved from https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001371235/mt-kenya-roots-for-one-man-one-vote-one-shilling

2. The Star. (2023, May 13). MUGWANG'A: One-man-one-shilling policy is deeply flawed, let's not entertain it. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.the-star.co.ke/oped/2023-05-13-mugwanga-one-man-one-shilling-policy-is-deeply-flawed-lets-not-entertain-it/

3. The Star. (2023, May 19). Mt Kenya leaders push for 'one man one vote one shilling' formula. The Star. Retrieved from https://www.the-star.co.ke/news

Post a Comment

0 Comments